Sachin Kumar @ Sachin Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.9279 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -605 Year- 2016 Thana -MOTIHARI TOWN DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ====================================================== Sachin Kumar @ Sachin Singh S/o Arun Kumar Singh @ Arun Singh resident of mohalla - Belbanwa, P.S. - Motihari (Town), District - East Champaran.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Virendra Kuar For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Suman Kumari Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR ORAL ORDER 15-03-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
The petitioner, already in custody, seeks bail in connection with Motihari (Town) P.S. Case No. 605 of 2016 registered under sections 399, 402 of the Indian Penal Code and 25 (1-B)a, 26, 35 of the Arms Act Allegation in brief is that the Police, on secret information that some criminals have assembled and making preparation for Dacoity, raided the house of the petitioner and recovered huge quantity of arms and ammunition, from the possession of the petitioner, one loaded country made pistol and more than eighty cartridges were recovered from his
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9279 of 2017 (2) dt.15-03-2017 2/2 house.
The counsel for the petitioner submits that only one loaded country made pistol and eight cartridges were recovered from the possession of the petitioner and one of the co-accused, namely, Abhishek Kumar, from whose possession one country made Katta and one loaded cartridge besides two other cartridges were recovered, has already been granted bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 55699 of 2016. However, the petitioner's case stands on different footing to Abhishek Kumar, as huge number of cartridges along with a country made pistol, were recovered from his house so, the prayer of bail of the petitioner is rejected at this stage. Learned Trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same preferably within one and half year. (Arun Kumar, J) Mahesh/- U T