Azad Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.13661 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -7 Year- 2017 Thana -RISHIUP District- AURANGABAD ====================================================== Azad Kumar, S/o Birbal Mehta @ Birbal Mahto, Resident of VillageBijahar, P.S.- Aurangabad (Muffasil), District- Aurangabad (Bihar). .... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nawak Kishor Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Meena Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 06-04-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
This is an application for bail in connection with Risiup P.S.Case No. 7 of 2017 registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of Bihar Excise Act, 2016. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner has clean antecedent and has remained in custody for three months and there is allegation of recovery of 46 litres of country made liquor.
Heard learned APP also.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13661 of 2017 (3) dt.06-04-2017 2/2 the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad, in connection with Risiup P.S.Case No. 7 of 2017, subject to the conditions that :- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U