Kesho Kumar Yadav @ Keshay Kumar @ Keshav Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10244 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-213 Year-2015 Thana- DULHIN BAZAR District- Patna ====================================================== Kesho Kumar Yadav @ Keshay Kumar @ Keshav Yadav Son of Chanddhari Yadav Resident of Village - Dorwan Mathiya, P.S.- Dulhin Bazar, District - Patna.
... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, Advocate.
For the Opposite Party:
APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 27-02-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner, who is in custody since 04.08.2017, has renewed his prayer for bail in connection with Sessions Trial No. 747 of 2017 arising out of Dulhin Bazar P.S. Case No. 213 of 2015 having twice been rejected by orders dated 14.12.2017 and 24.08.2018 in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 60020 of 2017 and Cr. Misc. No. 46122 of 2018 respectively.
3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and in a subsequent development, the informant and his father have recorded their respective depositions before the learned Court below stating that the deceased had been residing happily at her matrimonial home and had never complained about demand for money or motorcycle, and that the decease had
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10244 of 2019(2) dt.27-02-2019 2/2 fallen ill and died in course of treatment.
4. Be that as it may and having regard to the period of custody already suffered since 04.08.2017, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ADJ-I Danapur, Patna in connection with Dulhin Bazar P.S. Case No. 213 of 2015, on the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.
(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.
(iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.
(Vikash Jain, J) Ibrar//- U T