Buggi Thakur @ Pawan Thakur @ Pawan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13226 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-521 Year-2021 Thana- BEGUSARAI TOWN District- Begusarai ====================================================== Buggi Thakur @ Pawan Thakur @ Pawan Kumar S/O Late Bhothal Thakur @ Late Choudhary Thakur R/O Village- Baghi, Ward No. 24, P.S- Nagar (Lohiya Nagar O.P.), Distt.- Begusarai (Bihar). ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Shashank Chouhan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Manoj Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 03-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Sessions Trial No. 413 of 2024, arising out of Begusarai Town P.S. Case No. 521 of 2021, dated 25.08.2021, registered under Sections 302, 120B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act, pending before the Court of the District & Additional Sessions Judge-III, Begusarai.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this is the third bail application of the petitioner. The first bail application of the petitioner was rejected vide order dated 05.03.2024, passed in Cr. Misc. No. 81475 of 2023, and the second bail application of the petitioner was dismissed as
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13226 of 2026(3) dt.03-04-2026 2/2 withdrawn vide order dated 10.01.2025, passed in Cr. Misc. No. 85008 of 2024. Counsel further submits that the petitioner has been in custody since 31.07.2023 and the charge has already been framed. Counsel further submits that, considering the long period of custody, the petitioner may be released on bail.
4. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that there is a direct allegation against the petitioner of firing. Counsel further submits that the criminal antecedents of the petitioner are not clean, as there are seven criminal cases pending against him, out of which four cases are under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
5. In the present facts and circumstances, and particularly in view of the direct allegation of firing, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for regular bail is hereby rejected.
(Dr. Anshuman, J.) Aman Kumar/- U T