Patna High CourtCR. MISC./13989/2017bail granted

Rishikesh Pandey v. The State Of Bihar

2017-03-27Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.13989 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -54 Year- 2016 Thana -KAARAMCHAT SAHAYAK DistrictBHABHUA (KAIMUR) ======================================================

1. Rishikesh Pandey Son of Vijay Pandey Resident of Village- Majhiaon, P.S. Karamchat, District- Kaimur.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rakesh Kr. Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Arun Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 27-03-2017 The petitioner is in custody since 21.02.2017 in connection with Karamchat P.S. Case No. 54 of 2016, registered for offences punishable under Sections 304B, 201/34 Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is the bhainsur (elder brother-in-law) of the deceased and no specific allegation has been made against him and he has been in custody since 21.02.2017.

Learned counsel for the State also could not controvert the above fact.

Having heard both sides, in view of the fact that no specific allegation has been levelled against the petitioner, who is elder brother-in-law of the deceased, as such, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13989 of 2017 (2) dt.27-03-2017 2/2 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, Kaimur at Bhabhua, in connection with Karamchat P.S. Case No. 54 of 2016, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T