Patna High CourtCR. MISC./14501/2017bail granted

Sunil Yadav @ Sunil Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2017-03-29Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.14501 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -125 Year- 2016 Thana -JAGDIHSPUR District- BHOJPUR ====================================================== Sunil Yadav @ Sunil Kumar son of Shiv Jee Yadav, resident of villageKaushik Dular0pur, P.s.- Ara Muffasil, District- Bhojpur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Kalyan Shankar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 29-03-2017 Heard the parties.

This application has been filed in connection with Jagdishpur P.S.Case No.125 of 2016 for the offence under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that except the confessional statement there is nothing against the petitioner and that suspicion is because of the fact that the C.D.R. shows that the accused with in touch with the petitioner and except that there is nothing against him and no T.I.P. The petitioner is in custody since 08.06.2016.

Heard learned A.P.P. also, who could not controvert the above fact.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.14501 of 2017 (2) dt.29-03-2017 2/2 Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M. XI, Bhojpur at Ara in connection with Jagdishpur P.S.Case No.125 of 2016.

With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U