Nanki Saha @ Gopal Kumar Saha v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24532 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-222 Year-2019 Thana- BAUSI District- Purnia ====================================================== NANKI SAHA @ GOPAL KUMAR SAHA, aged about 33 years, GenderMale, Son of Doman Saha, R/o Vill.- Farsara, P.S.- Dalkola, Distt- Uttar Dinajpur (W.B.).

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr.Shri Prakash Tiwari, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party :

Mr.Shyameshwar Dayal, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 05-07-2021 Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defects, as pointed out by the office, within a period of four weeks from the date of restoration of normalcy. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State through virtual mode.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case for the offence registered under Sections 272, 273 of the I.P.C. and 30(a), 33, 41 and 47 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

The prosecution story, in brief, is that total 6600 liters wine is said to have been recovered from the Truck in question. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24532 of 2021(2) dt.05-07-2021 2/3 present case. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the petitioner. It is alleged that total 6600 liters wine is recovered from the Truck in question. The Truck in question does not belong to the petitioner. The name of the petitioner has transpired in the present case on the basis of disclosure made by co-accused. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioner in this case. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr. P.C.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R/ Complaint Case. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on his personal bond to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge, (Excise), Purnea, in connection with Baisi P.S. Case No. 222 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Once the normalcy is restored, the petitioner shall

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24532 of 2021(2) dt.05-07-2021 3/3 furnish bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) only with two sureties of the like amount each within a period of eight weeks to the satisfaction of the court concerned in connection with the aforesaid case.

(Sudhir Singh, J) U.K./- U T