Bijay Kant Ray, v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3640 of 2019 ====================================================== Bijay Kant Ray, Male, aged about 60 years, Son of Sri Biltan Ray, Resident of House No. 101, Ward No.09, P.S.- Ghanshyampur, District- Darbhanga. ... ... Petitioner
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.
The Principal Secretary, Department of Forest and Environment, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3.
The District Magistrate, Darbhanga.
4.
The Bihar State Pollution Control Board, Parivesh Bhawan NSB -II Patliputra Industrial Area, Patna through its Member Secretary. 5.
The Chairman, The Bihar State Pollution Control Board, Parivesh Bhawan NSB-II Patliputra Industrial Area, Patna.
6.
The Member Secretary of the Bihar State Polllution Control Board, Parivesh Bhawan, NSB-II Patliputra Industrial Area, Patna. 7.
The Department of Mines and Geology, Government of Bihar, Patna through the Joint Secretary.
8.
The District Mining Officer, Darbhanga.
9.
The Circle Officer, Ghanshyampur, Darbhanga.
10.
M/s Roy (15) Int Udyog through its Proprietor Raghav Kumar Ray Son of Sri Sudhir Ray, situated at Village- Roy Tola, P.S. Ghanshayampur, DistrictDarbhanga. ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Abhay Kumar Thakur, Adv.
For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Sarvesh Kumar Singh, AAG13 For respondent no.10 : Mr. Manish Kumar, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN) 26-06-2019 A counter affidavit is being filed. Let it be taken on record.
Matter has been listed at the instance of learned counsel for the petitioner Mr. Abhay Kumar Thakur, who prays
Patna High Court CWJC No.3640 of 2019(4) dt.26-06-2019 2/2 for withdrawal of the writ petition because according to him, cause has been rendered infructuous by passage of time. Learned counsel for the State has no objection. The writ petition is disposed of as infructuous. (Jyoti Saran, J) ( Partha Sarthy, J) Anjula/Surendra U