Pappu Rai v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.10233 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -314 Year- 2016 Thana -HAJIPUR SADAR DistrictVAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ======================================================

1. Pappu Rai, S/o Sri Lalan Rai, Resident of Village- Belka, P.S.- Vaishali, District- Vaishali.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shyameshwar Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Indra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 06-03-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Hajipur Sadar P.S. Case No. 314 of 2016, registered for offences punishable under Section 25(1-b)A/26 of Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that alleged recovery one country made pistol and three cartridges, however for the same occurrence, two F.I.R has been lodged and petitioner has no criminal antecedent and has been languishing in judicial custody since 28.08.2016.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of offence, period of custody and also the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate,

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.10233 of 2017 (2) dt.06-03-2017 2/2 Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Hajipur Sadar P.S. Case No. 314 of 2016, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

It is also made clear that if the petitioner again found involved in any of such offence, in future, prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U