Jai Prakash Choudhary v. The State Of Bihar Through Brajesh Mehrota, Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Bihar, Patna A
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3294 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13094 of 2017 ====================================================== Jai Prakash Choudhary Son of Raghunath Choudhary Resident of VillageSemridev @Semri, Police Station- Karagahar, District- Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State Of Bihar Through Brajesh Mehrota, Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Bihar, Patna 2.
Pankaj Dikshit, the District Magistrate Rohtas. 3.
Raj Kumari Gupta, the Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Sasaram, DistrictRohtas. 4.
Sajeev Kumar Rai, the Circle Officer , Kargahar Anchal, District- Rohtas. 5.
Bharath Baitha 6.
Shatmdhan Baitha 7.
Deonath Baitha All Sons of Bikau Baitha All Resident of Village- Semridev @ Semri, Police Station- Karagahar, District- Rohtas. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
None For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Md. Khurshid Alam - AAG-12 Ms. Nutan Sahay, A.C. to A.A.G.-12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 05-09-2022 The Circle Officer, Kargahar Anhal, District-Rohtas is present in Court. However, learned counsel for the petitioner is not present.
Learned counsel for the State submits that she has received instruction orally that the encroachment has been removed, but due to law and order situation, statement of fact and the affidavit could not be prepared.
Learned Advocate for the Respondent No. 5 and 7
Patna High Court MJC No.3294 of 2018(6) dt.05-09-2022 2/2 appears and says that he had no notice of the earlier order. This statement has been made only orally and the same cannot be relied.
In view of the statement of the Circle Officer, Khargahar Anchal, that the encroachment has been removed, this application is dismissed.
(Sandeep Kumar, J) Saif/-sunny U