Patna High CourtCR. MISC./14437/2017bail granted

Ritesh Kumar Keshari @ Monu v. The State Of Bihar

2017-03-29Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.14437 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -69 Year- 2017 Thana -BHABHUA District- BHABHUA (KAIMUR) ======================================================

1. Ritesh Kumar Keshari @ Monu, son of Rajkumar Keshari, VillageBhabua Ward No. 24, P.O. + P.S.- Bhabua, District- Kaimur (Bhabua). .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Nandan Sahay For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajkishore Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 29-03-2017 Heard the parties.

This application has been filed in connection with Bhabua P.S.Case No.69 of 2017 for the offence under Sections 30(A) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2016. According to the petitioner, the recovery is of 19 ltrs. of foreign liquor from two persons and he has no criminal antecedent. The petitioner has remained in custody for about two months.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of having no previous case of such nature as well as he has remained in custody for about two months, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.14437 of 2017 (2) dt.29-03-2017 2/2 Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Kaimur at Bhabua in connection with Bhabua P.S.Case No.69 of 2017.

With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U