Mukhdeo Singh Bhokta @ Mukhiya Ji v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10791 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-6 Year-2025 Thana- CHAKARANDHA P.S. District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.

Mukhdeo Singh Bhokta @ Mukhiya Ji S/o Late Mahavir Singh Bhokta R/o Village- Kachanaha, PS- Chhakarbandha, Distt.- Gaya. 2.

Sunil Bharat @ Butan Bharati @ Sunil Bharati S/o Late Tetar Bharati R/o Village- Kachanaha, PS- Chhakarbandha, Distt.- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Anil Kumar Singh, Advocate.

Mr. Sudhir Kumar Sinha, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Vinod Shanker Modi, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 26-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. Petitioners seek regular bail in connection with Chhakarbandha P.S. Case No.06 of 2025 for the offences registered under Sections 103(1), 61(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioners on the pretext of giving him liquor taken the brother of the informant near the local school and the co-accused Akhilesh Singh and his brother-in-laws' brother namely Rahul Singh Bhokta shot fire and killed the brother of the informant.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that there is no specific allegation against the petitioners for killing the deceased. Learned counsel submits

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10791 of 2026(2) dt.26-02-2026 2/2 that from bare perusal of F.I.R. it appears that petitioners called for taking wine to the decease and no any overt act has been alleged against the petitioners. He further submits that charge sheet has already been submitted in this case after completion of investigation. Learned counsel submits that petitioners have got clean antecedent, they are in custody since 27.04.2025 and they undertake to co-operate in the trial. There is no chance of absconding the petitioners or tampering with the evidence.

5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State opposes the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioners.

6. Considering the submissions made on behalf of the parties, facts and circumstances of the case, the nature of allegation against the petitioners and the fact that charge sheet has already been submitted in this case as well as the period of custody already undergone by them, let the petitioners, named above, be enlarged on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Gaya/ concerned Court in connection with Chhakabandi P.S. Case No.06 of 2025.

(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) Ritik/- U T