Rana Singh @ Aman Prashar @ Aman Prabhakar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12356 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-46 Year-2021 Thana- BARGAINIA District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Rana Singh @ Aman Prashar @ Aman Prabhakar S/O Ajay Kumar Singh @ Ajay Singh R/O Village- Pachtaki Ram, P.S- Bairgania, District- Sitamarhi. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bipin Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Amitesh Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 11-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned counsel for the State.

2. The following order was passed on 04.03.2023:- "Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Bairgania P.S. Case No. 46 of 2021 registered for the offence punishable under Section 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

Considering the fact that the petitioner has 14 criminal antecedent, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

This application is dismissed with a direction to the District Judge, Sitamarhi to transfer all the cases pending against the present petitioner in one court having

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12356 of 2025(3) dt.11-07-2025 2/2 jurisdiction over the cases and get the trial of the aforesaid cases expedited.

Let a copy of this order be communicated to the District Judge, Sitamarhi through FAX forthwith for its compliance.

The petitioner may renew his prayer for bail if there is no substantial progress in the trial and after he is granted bail in all other criminal cases."

3. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner may be granted bail as the trial is being delayed.

4. Learned counsel for the informant submitted that out of eleven witnesses, seven witnesses have already been examined.

5. In these circumstances, when the trial is proceeding, I am not inclined to grant bail tot he petitioner. Moreover, petitioner has 14 criminal antecedents out of which in four cases, he has acquitted.

6. Accordingly, this application is dismissed. (Sandeep Kumar, J) Ranjeet/- U T