← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./13478/2024bail rejected

Ranjan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2024-05-08Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13478 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-330 Year-2022 Thana- KHUSRUPUR District- Patna ====================================================== Ranjan Kumar Son of Tulla Singh @ Tula Singh Resident of Village- Lodipur Mansurpur, P.S.- Khushrupur, District- Patna (Bihar) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pintu Kumar Patel, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Syed Ehteshamuddin, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 08-05-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Khusrupur P.S. Case No.330 of 2022, registered for the offences punishable under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. As per the prosecution, FIR has been lodged against 20 named accused persons including the present petitioner. In the FIR, allegation against the present petitioner and one Anmol Kumar is that they have assaulted by fire-arm on the cousin of the informant, due to which he received injury on his right leg.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13478 of 2024(3) dt.08-05-2024 2/2 antecedent of the petitioner is clean. Counsel submits that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence.

5. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

6. Learned counsel for the informant submits that only one person has been granted bail against whom there is no allegation of overt-act.

7. In the present facts and circumstances, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Hence, the prayer for anticipatory bail is refused. However, in the event of surrender of the petitioner, the prayer for regular bail shall be considered without being prejudiced by the order of this Court.

(Dr. Anshuman, J) Mkr./- U T