Patna High CourtCR. MISC./11848/2017dismissed

Ram Shresth Ram @ Ram Sresth Ram v. The State Of Bihar

2017-04-18Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.11848 of 2017 (3) dt.18-04-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.11848 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -33 Year- 2015 Thana -GAYGHAT District- MUZAFFARPUR ======================================================

1. Ram Shresth Ram @ Ram Sresth Ram Son of Visheshwar Ram, Resident of Village- Baruari, P.S.- Gaighat, District- Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Smt.. Bela Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Lakshmi Kant Sharma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 18-04-2017 The petitioner is in custody since 21.10.2016 in connection with Gaighat P.S. Case No. 33 of 2015, registered for offences punishable under Sections 304B, 201/34 Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that though the petitioner is husband and the case is under Section 304B of Indian Penal Code but he has falsely been implicated in this case as the deceased died her natural death, this fact has also been admitted by father of the deceased and he has also filed a petition in this regard. Petitioner has been in judicial custody since 21.10.2016.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the fact that there is

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.11848 of 2017 (3) dt.18-04-2017 allegation against the petitioner of demand of dowry and torture and the death of the deceased is within seven years of her marriage ,as such, I am not inclined to grant the petitioner privilege of regular bail, his prayer for bail is accordingly rejected. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial and try to conclude it as early as possible and once informant and father of deceased is examined, petitioner may renew his prayer for bail before the court below, which will be considered by the court below on the basis of materials available on record at that point of time.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T