Satyam Bharati @ Sattyam Bharti @ Satyam Bharti v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10893 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-312 Year-2021 Thana- RAJAON District- Banka ====================================================== Satyam Bharati @ Sattyam Bharti @ Satyam Bharti Son of Indradev Kumar @ Indradeo Kumar Resident of Village- Kahalgaon N.T.P.C. Gate No. 1, P.S.- Kahalgaon N.T.P.C., District- Bhagalpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Aarti Kumari Wife of Satyam Bharati @ Sattyam Bharti @ Satyam Bharti Daughter of Madan Yadav Resident of Village- Jagdishpur, P.S.- Rajoun District- Banka.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vinay Kumar Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Mithlesh Kumar Khare ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 11-07-2022 Let the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, be removed within a period of four weeks from today. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Rajoun P.S. Case No. 312/2021 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3⁄4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

Both parties are ready to settle the dispute. Without going into the merits of the matter, let the petitioner above named be released on provisional bail for a period of two months on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10893 of 2022(2) dt.11-07-2022 2/2 (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banka in connection with Rajoun P.S. Case No. 312/2021. The court below is directed to make suitable effort for the purpose of conciliation between the parties. The petitioner and the Opposite Party No.2 would have the opportunity to work out an amicable resolution of the issue.

If an amicable resolution is worked out within two months, petitioner would be entitled to confirmation of his provisional bail.

If, on the other hand, the issue is not resolved between the parties, the Court below, needless to say, would be well within its jurisdiction to exercise its judicial discretion and pass appropriate orders, which may include cancellation of the petitioner's provisional bail.

This application stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

(Alok Kumar Pandey, J) amitkumar/- U T