Patna High CourtCR. MISC./18688/2017bail granted

Raju Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2017-05-11Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.18688 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -38 Year- 2017 Thana -BHANGWANPUR HAT District- SIWAN ======================================================

1. Raju Kumar Yadav Son of Gangdeo Rai, resident of village - Jagdishpur, P.S. Bhagwanpur Hat, District - Siwan .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ved Prakash Srivastva For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ram Anurag Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 11-05-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bhagwanpur Hat P.S. Case No. 38 of 2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 413 and 414 of the Indian Penal Code arising out of G.R. No. 703 of 2017. Allegedly, the petitioner was sitting on motorcycle which was being driven by co-accused Amit Kumar and after interrogation it comes out that the motorcycle is stolen one. Submission is of false implication and that the petitioner is suffering in custody since 15.02.2017, nothing was recovered from conscious possession and there is no theft report regarding the said motorcycle.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18688 of 2017 (2) dt.11-05-2017 2/2 The learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer of bail. In the facts and circumstances stated above, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail after completion of six months in custody from the date of his remand on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM-II, Siwan in connection with Bhagwanpur Hat P.S. Case No. 38 of 2017, G.R. No. 703 of 2017 subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) sushma/- U T