Mundrika Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9532 of 2021 ======================================================

1. Pratima Devi, wife of late Mundrika Singh Resident of Mohalla- Ring Bandh, Ward No. 17 P.S. and District-Sitamarhi.

2. Abhishek Kumar, son of late Mundrika Singh Resident of Mohalla- Ring Bandh, Ward No. 17 P.S. and District-Sitamarhi. ... ... Petitioners

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Rural Works Department, Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Secreary, Rural Works Department, Govt. of Bihar, Vishveshwarya Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

3.

The Collector, Sitamarhi, District-Sitamarhi. 4.

The District Planing Officer, Sitamarhi, District-Sitamarhi. 5.

The Sub-Divisional Officer, Sadar Sitamarhi, District-Sitamarhi. 6.

The Superintending Engineer, Local Area Engineering Organization, Work Division, Muzaffarpur, District-Muzaffarpur 7.

The Executive Engineer, Local Area Engineering Organization, Work Division-I, Sitamarhi, District-Sitamarhi 8.

The District Panchayat Raj Officer-Cum-Nodal Officer, Dumra, DistrictSitamarhi. 9.

The Assistant Engineer, Local Area Engineering Organization, Work Division-I, Sitamarhi.

... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shankar Kumar For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Ajay (Ga5) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH) 06-05-2022 I.A. No. 1 of 2022 has been filed for substitution of the legal representatives of the petitioner, who is said to have died during the pendency of the writ application. The heirs/legal representatives of the deceased petitioner have been described in

Patna High Court CWJC No.9532 of 2021(7) dt.06-05-2022 2/2 paragraph 4 of the substitution application. Vakalatnama has already been filed on behalf of the said legal representatives proposed to be substituted.

Considering the facts and circumstances, I.A. No. 1 of 2022 is allowed.

Let name of the petitioner be struck off from the cause title of the writ application and in his place names of his legal representatives, as described in paragraph 4 of I.A. No. 1 of 2022, be substituted.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners' grievance has been redressed during the pendency of this writ application. This writ application stands disposed of accordingly. There is apparent typographical error in I.A. No. 1 of 2022 inasmuch as in the first page, in place of 'C.W.J.C. No. 9532 of 2021', 'C.W.J.C. No. 9532 of 2020' has been typed. Let correction be entered by the office to the aforesaid effect.

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) Madhuresh Prasad, J) Pawan/- U