Durgesh Bind @ Durgesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10753 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-281 Year-2025 Thana- JAHANABAD District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Durgesh Bind @ Durgesh Kumar S/o Satendra Bind @ Satyendra Vind @ Satyendra Bind Resident of village- Parashurampur @ Pasurampur, P.S.- Jehanabad (Kalpa), Distt.- Jehanabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Raju Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 02-04-2026 Heard Mr. Raju Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, learned APP for the State.

2. Petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since 06.10.2025, in connection with Jehanabad (Kalpa) P.S. Case No. 281 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 09.04.2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. Allegation against the petitioner is that he along with other co-accused persons have committed the murder of the informant's husband, namely, Shailesh Bind.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submits that the allegation as alleged in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10753 of 2026(3) dt.02-04-2026 2/3 the F.I.R. is false and fabricated and the petitioner has not commited any offence as alleged in the F.I.R. He further submits that from perusal of the F.I.R. it appears that the informant is not an eye witness to the alleged occurrence and she has made accused to the petitioner merely on the basis of suspicion and except the suspicion, no other cogent material has come during investigation to suggest the involvement of the petitioner in the present occurrence. He further submits that the police after investigation submitted chargesheet against the petitioner and the petitioner is in custody since 06.10.2025.

5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and apart from that the petitioner carries one more case other than the present one but fairly submits on the basis of paragraph-3 of the bail petition that the petitioner is on bail in the pending matter.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad in connection

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10753 of 2026(3) dt.02-04-2026 3/3 with Jehanabad (Kalpa) P.S. Case No. 281 of 2025, subject to the following conditions :-

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witness, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(3) And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedents, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Ibrar//- U T