Rajan Kumar Sah v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.5772 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -208 Year- 2016 Thana -GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ====================================================== Rajan Kumar Sah, son of Manohar Sah, resident of Village- Lalgarh, Police Station- Muffasil Bettiah, District- West Champaran. .... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Lal Babu Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anand Mohan Prasad Mehta, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 16-02-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
This is an application for bail in connection with Excise Case No. 208 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner has clean antecedent and has remained in custody for four months and there is recovery of four litres of Nepali wine and he has been falsely implicated in this case.
Heard learned APP also.
Having heard both sides and considering the fact that petitioner has clean antecedent and has remain in custody for four months, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand)
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.5772 of 2017 (2) dt.16-02-2017 2/2 with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Raxaul, Motihari, in connection with Excise Case No. 208 of 2016, subject to the conditions that :- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, the prosecution is free to move the cancellation of his bail.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U