Manoj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.10279 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -77 Year- 2015 Thana -ARIYARI District- SEKHPURA ======================================================

1. Manoj Kumar son of Late Janardan Singh resident of village Indupur, P.S.- Barahiya, District- Lakhisarai.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Deepak Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Nawal Kishore Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 27-03-2017 The petitioner is in custody since 19.12.2016 in connection with Ariari (Kasar) P.S. Case No. 77 of 2015, registered for offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468 of Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner has nothing to do with Birla Sun Life Insurance Company, petitioner is neither the agent of the said insurance company nor franchise of the said company. Further it has been submitted that in this case a chart has been given by the persons who have been cheated, but the aforesaid persons had not been examined during course of investigation and so far petitioner is concerned, nothing has been alleged against him. Petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and has been in judicial custody since 19.12.2016 and now the charge-sheet has also been filed.

Learned counsel for the State opposed the prayer for bail.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.10279 of 2017 (3) dt.27-03-2017 2/2 Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of offence, period of custody and also that now the charge-sheet has also been filed, as such, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, Sheikhpura in connection with Ariari (Kasar) P.S. Case No. 77 of 2015, with following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T