Patna High CourtCR. MISC./11562/2019allowed

Dharo Singh @ Dharwa v. The State Of Bihar

2019-02-26Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11562 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-188 Year-2018 Thana- KHARIK District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== DHARO SINGH @ DHARWA Son of Gholti Singh Resident of VillageJamaldipur, P.S.- Kharik, District- Bhagalpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ranjan Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 26-02-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

The petitioner is in custody in connection with Kharik P.S. Case No. 188 of 2018 for the offence under Sections 414 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25 (1-b)a/26 (i) of the Arms Act.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submit that allegation against this petitioner is that one country made pistol and along with one Bindolia in which nine cartridges were recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that nothing was recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner or from the house of the petitioner. He submits that in the instant case petitioner is in custody since 16.8.2018.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11562 of 2019(2) dt.26-02-2019 2/2 Considering the aforesaid, the Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Court of learned A.C.J.M. 1st Naugachia, in connection with Kharik P.S. Case No. 188 of 2018, subject to the conditions that his both bailors should be family members of the petitioner and in the event it is reported by the informant side that the petitioner has tried to terrorize the witnesses, the Court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) T.Kr./- U T