Subodh Kumar Nonia v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9282 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-359 Year-2019 Thana- RANIGANJ District- Araria ====================================================== SUBODH KUMAR NONIA Son of Maheshwar Nonia Resident of Village - Belgachhi, Ward No. 01, P.S.- Raniganj, Distt - Araria. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ramesh Kumar Singh, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Tiwary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 05-06-2020 The matter has been taken up through video conferencing.

Heard the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302,201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The FIR is against 14 named and several unnamed person alleging therein that they have committed the murder. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that investigation of the case is already complete. Only material is suspicion. Some other co-accused, having identical allegation and named in the FIR, have already been allowed bail in the past.

Considering the entire facts of the case aforesaid, let

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9282 of 2020(3) dt.05-06-2020 2/2 the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Raniganj Police Station Case No.359 of 2019 with following conditions: (a) Both the bailors shall be resident of territorial jurisdiction of the learned Court-below.

(b) The petitioner shall fully cooperate with the trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner.

(c) The petitioner shall not leave the country without permission of the trial Court.

If the petitioner would not be able in furnishing sureties due to lock-down, he shall be provisionally released on his personal bond and the provisional bail shall be confirmed only after production of the bailors within fifteen days of restoration of normal function of the Court.

(Birendra Kumar, J) Nitesh/- U T