Ghina Singh @ Dheena Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.12843 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -122 Year- 2016 Thana -CHANDRADEEP District- JAMUI ====================================================== Ghina Singh @ Dheena Singh son of Sadhu Singh, resident of village - Noni, P.S. - Chandradeep, District Jamui.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party: APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 18-03-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 26.12.2016 in connection with Chandradeep P.S. Case No. 122 of 2016 for the alleged offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 324, 325, 307, 379, 354 and 384 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated owing to political rivalry and in any event, specific accusation of assault is against other accused persons and the accusation against the petitioner along with some others is general and omnibus in nature. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Jamui in connection with Chandradeep P.S. Case No. 122 of 2016 on the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12843 of 2017 (2) dt.18-03-2017 2/2 (ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(iv) The petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Vikash Jain, J) B.T/Ibrar U T