Premchand Paswan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.13967 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -9 Year- 2017 Thana -BIHTA District- PATNA ======================================================
1. Premchand Paswan S/o Sunder Paswan, Resident of Village- Pareo, P.S.- Bihta, District- Patna.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Suresh Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Vinod Shankar Modi ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 27-03-2017 The petitioner is in custody since 14.01.2017 in connection with Bihta P.S. Case No. 09 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 30(a) of Bihar Excise Act. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that though there is allegation of recovery of 45 litres of liquor, however he has clean antecedent and has been sufficiently punished for the said offence as he has been in judicial custody since 14.01.2017.
Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of offence and period of custody, and also that the petitioner has clean antecedent, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13967 of 2017 (2) dt.27-03-2017 2/2 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM-, Danapur (Patna), in connection with Bihta P.S. Case No. 09/2017, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.
(ii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.
It is also made clear if the petitioner again found involved in any of the offences, his bail bond will be cancelled. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T