Golu Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14513 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-557 Year-2025 Thana- MAHARAJGANJ District- Siwan ====================================================== Golu Kumar Singh, S/o Raj Kishor Singh, R/o Village- Bhikha Bandh, P.S.- Daraunda, District- Siwan.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rajiv Nayan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 02-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Maharajganj P.S. Case No. 557 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 310(4), 310(5) and 111 of B.N.S. and Sections 25(1-b)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act along with Sections 8, 20(b), 11B of N.D.P.S. Act.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that police had information that certain miscreants have gathered at villageIndauli for committing some offence. On this input, the police reached the place of occurrence and from the possession of this petitioner, one sharp edged weapon and a mobile was recovered and from the possession of the co-accused, 2 Kg. of ganja was also recovered.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14513 of 2026(3) dt.02-04-2026 2/2 has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. It has been submitted that only a knife has been recovered from the possession of this petitioner and as such, allegations under the Arms Act and N.D.P.S. Act are not attracted against him. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from his possession. The seizure list witnesses are police personnel and police has not complied Section 105 of the B.N.S.S. while making the seizure. Petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 18.11.2025.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the application for bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Principal District Judge, Siwan in connection with Maharajganj P.S. Case No. 557 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T