Patna High CourtCR. MISC./12994/2024bail granted

Chitranjan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2024-06-21Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61299 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-78 Year-2024 Thana- KUSHESHWARASTHAN DistrictDarbhanga ====================================================== SACHIN KUMAR CHAUPAL @ SACHIN KUMAR SON OF SANTOSH CHAUPAL RESIDENT OF SAMAILA, P.S -KUSHESHWAR STHAN, DIST- DARBHANGA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Jitendra Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shyam Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 10-09-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Kusheshwar Sthan P.S. Case No. 78 of 2024 dated 08.04.2024 registered for the offences punishable u/ss 363, 365, 341, 342, 323 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25(1-b)a, 26 of the Arms Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is alleged to have kidnapped the informant and took her to his house where he assaulted her and pointed katta on her but during scuffle, the victim snatched the said katta and hid the same in her waist. It is further alleged that the petitioner took her to a maize field and confined her and also threatened her. The informant was weeping in the maize field and in the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61299 of 2024(2) dt.10-09-2024 2/2 morning, her villager traced her and they took her to her house.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel has further submitted that no occurrence has taken place as stated in the F.I.R. There is no eye witness to the alleged occurrence. It is further submitted that the petitioner has no concern with the alleged offence. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 27.05.2024.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Darbhanga in connection with Kusheshwar Sthan P.S. Case No. 78 of 2024.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Gautam/- U T