Patna High CourtCR. MISC./10553/2019bail granted

Ghuran Jha v. The State Of Bihar

2019-05-15Mr. Justice Rajendra Kumar Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10553 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-266 Year-2015 Thana- BISFI (PATAUNA) District- Madhubani ====================================================== GHURAN JHA Son of Late Keshaw Jha Resident of Village - Murliya Chak ,p.s.-Bisfi(patauna),District-Madhubani ... ... Petitioner.

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party.

====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Gagan Deo Yadav, Advocate.

For the State :

Mr. A.M.P. Mehta, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 15-05-2019 As prayed for, learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in the cause title of this application with regard to the age of the petitioner within course of the day.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Bisfi (Patauna) P.S. Case No.266 of 2015 registered under Sections 341, 354(B) and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation is that in the morning of 12.11.2015, the daughter of the informant had gone to pluck the flower. At that time, this petitioner caught hold the hand of the daughter of the informant with bad intention and pressing her mouth, took her at his verandah. When the daughter of the informant raised alarm, the nearby people

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10553 of 2019(3) dt.15-05-2019 2/2 gathered and, thereafter, the petitioner fled away. Due to prestige in the society and fear, the informant did not go to the police station. The petitioner is giving threatening to the informant of dire consequences in case the complaint is made at the police station. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, admittedly, he petitioner is the Pattidar of the informant. The alleged occurrence took place on 12.11.2015 but the F.I.R. was lodged by the informant on 13.11.2015, i.e., after two days of the occurrence. In fact, due to family dispute, the informant has lodged the present case with false allegation. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

Having considered the facts and the circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender by him within six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Benipatti, Madhubani, in connection with Bisfi (Patauna) P.S. Case No.266 of 2015, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) P.S.