Punam Devi @ Punam Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10953 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-312 Year-2021 Thana- RAJAON District- Banka ====================================================== 1.

Punam Devi @ Punam Kumari Wife Of Indradev Kumar @ Indradeo Kumar R/O Village- Kahalgaon N.T.P.C. Gate No.1, P.S.- N.T.P.C. Kahalgaon, District- Bhagalpur 2.

Shivam Bharti @ Sumit @ Sumit Bharti Son Of Indradev Kumar @ Indradeo Kumar R/O Village- Kahalgaon N.T.P.C. Gate No.1, P.S.- N.T.P.C. Kahalgaon, District- Bhagalpur 3.

Sundaram Bharti @ Navneet Bharti Son Of Indradev Kumar @ Indradeo Kumar R/O Village- Kahalgaon N.T.P.C. Gate No.1, P.S.- N.T.P.C. Kahalgaon, District- Bhagalpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Aarti Kumari Wife Of Satyam Bharati, D/O- Madan Yadav R/O VillageJagdishpur, P.S.- Rajoun, District- Banka ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vinay Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Mithlesh Kumar Khare, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 29-08-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

It is a case of cruelty due to non-fulfilment of dowry demand by in-laws of the family.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10953 of 2022(2) dt.29-08-2022 2/2 that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that there is general and omnibus allegation against these petitioners and the petitioners have live separately from the spouse, i.e., husband and wife and the main allegation is upon the husband of the victim, namely, Satyam Bharati. Petitioners have clean antecedent.

Learned APP appearing for the State opposed the anticipatory bail.

Considering the aforesaid submissions, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Banka in connection with Rajoun P.S. Case No. 312 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Brajesh Kumar/- U T