Afjal Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9698 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-444 Year-2018 Thana- GARKHA District- Saran ====================================================== Afjal Ansari Son of Najmul Haque Resident of Village- Garkha, P.S.- Garkha, District- Saran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Abhay Kumar Thakur, Advocate Mr. Shashank, Advocate Mr. Pravin Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Abhay Kumar Roy, APP For the Informant :

Mr. Pramod Kumar Sinha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 30-04-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioner is languishing in custody for the offences punishable under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

The FIR of the occurrence of murder of the son of the informant is against unknown. The petitioner has got no criminal antecedent.

Submission is that the petitioner is in custody since 12.10.2018. Investigation of the case is already complete. Learned counsel for the informant opposed the prayer for bail. He submits that during investigation it revealed

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9698 of 2019(3) dt.30-04-2019 2/2 that the deceased had collected money from different persons for providing them job and the said money was given to this petitioner.

Considering the fact that there is no direct evidence against the petitioner, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail after framing of the charge on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court-below where the case is pending in connection with Garkha P.S. Case No.444 of 2018, with following conditions:

(a) Both the bailors shall be the resident of territorial jurisdiction of the learned Court-below having immovable property in his name.

(b) The petitioner shall fully cooperate with the trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner.

(Birendra Kumar, J) Mkr./- U T