Mahesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3766 of 2020 ====================================================== Mahesh Kumar S/o Bilayati Mahto @ Vilayati Mahto R/o Village- Rajesh Nagar, P.s.- Maranchi, District- Patna, under the guardianship of his next friend and natural guardian (brother)-Rajeev Kumar aged about 25 years, male, S/o Bilayati Mahto @ Vilayati Mahto, R/o Village- Rajesh Nagar, P.o.- Malpur, P.s.- Maranchi, District- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 2.

The Director, Secondary Education, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 3.

The Bihar School Examination Board, through its Secretary, Patna-17 4.

The Secretary, Bihar School Examination Board, Patna-17 5.

The Examination Controller (Senior Secondary) Bihar School Examination Board, Patna-17 6.

The Deputy Examination Controller (Senior Secondary) Bihar School Examination Board, Patna-17 7.

Anugrah Narayan Singh College, Patna through its Principal, Barh, Patna803213 8.

The Principal, Anugrah Narayan Singh College, Barh, Patna-803213 9.

The Controller of Examination, Anugrah Narayan Singh College, Barh, Patna-803213 10.

The Assistant Controller, Anugrah Narayan Singh College, Barh, Patna803213 ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Vagisha Pragya Vacaknavi, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Jitendra Kr. Roy 1, S.C.-13 For Respondent no.7 :

Mr. Ranjeet Kumar, Adv.

Mr. Shikhar Mani, Adv.

Ms. Lakshmi Kumari, Adv.

For the BSEB :

Mr. Satyabir Bharti, Adv.

Ms. Kanupriya, Adv.

Mr. Abhishek Anand, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 09-09-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.

Patna High Court CWJC No.3766 of 2020(3) dt.09-09-2024 2/2

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ application as it has become infructuous.

3. Permission is granted.

4. Accordingly, this application stands disposed of as infructuous.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) divyanshi/- U