Premjeet Kumar @ Premjit Kumar @ Putus v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15966 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1552 Year-2022 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPatna ====================================================== Premjeet Kumar @ Premjit Kumar @ Putus son of Jai Nandan Singh VillageRajpur Neora Ps- Bihta Dist- patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Nitesh Kumar son of Babu Sharma R/o- Bank Colony Lane No-10, W.No38, Ps- Danapur Dist- Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Anjani Kumar Jha, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Akshay Lal Pandit, APP For Opposite Party No.2 :

Mr. Hansraj, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 14-03-2024 Heard learned counsels for the parties.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a complaint case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471, 34, 323, 504 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per prosecution case, this petitioner, even after receiving the consideration money in advance, refused to register the land in favour of the mother of the complainant.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that this petitioner was broker of the said sale and purchase of the land between the complainant and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15966 of 2024(2) dt.14-03-2024 2/3 Accused Nos. 2 and 3 and commission of Rs. 36,50,000/- was agreed. It is further submitted that two cheques of Rs. 10,00,000/- each was given to the petitioner by the complainant, which were dishonoured and when the petitioner filed Complaint Case No. 1344 C of 2022, this false and concocted case has been lodged against the petitioner and other accused persons. It is further submitted that the dispute is of civil nature for which the complainant has got alternative remedies. Petitioner claims clean antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, nature of dispute, case and counter-case and clean antecedents of the petitioner, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is allowed.

7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Danapur, in connection with Complaint Case No.1552(c) of 2022, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15966 of 2024(2) dt.14-03-2024 3/3 Criminal Procedure.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T