Raj Kumar Ray v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11209 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-231 Year-2018 Thana- DARIYAPUR District- Saran ====================================================== Raj Kumar Ray Son Of Shri Virendra Ray Resident Of Bajahiya, P.S.- Dariyapur, District- Saran 841221.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Kumar Ravish Ms. Siddhi Aashana For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Dilip Kr. No. 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 05-09-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 188, 341, 342, 323, 324, 325, 307, 353, 332, 333, 379, 283, 387, 338, 427, 435 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

Petitioner and other accused persons are said to have obstructed the work of the police and also blocked the road. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that there is general and omnibus allegation

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11209 of 2022(3) dt.05-09-2022 2/2 levelled against the petitioner. He submits that the petitioner was not present in the mob but his name has been illegally dragged in the case at the instance of his enemies and out of local village politics. He submits that similarly situated co-accused has already been granted bail by the learned court below itself. He further submits that petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application.

Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that there is no specific allegation against the petitioner, let the above named petitioner in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Dariyapur P.S. Case No. 231 of 2018, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

devendra/- (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) U T