Sheo Kumari Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10710 of 2014 ====================================================== 1.1. Mahendra Prasad Singh Son of Late Sheo Kumari Devi, Resident of Village Dilip Chak Mittan Bhagat Ka Tola, P.O. and P.S. Shahpur, District- Patna. 1.2. Shambhu Prasad Singh, Son of Late Sheo Kumari Devi, Resident of Village Dilip Chak Mittan Bhagat Ka Tola, P.O. and P.S. Shahpur, District- Patna. 1.3. Vinod Prasad, Son of Late Sheo Kumari Devi, Resident of Village Dilip Chak Mittan Bhagat Ka Tola, P.O. and P.S. Shahpur, District- Patna. 1.4. Kunti Devi, Daughter of Late Sheo Kumari Devi, Resident of Village Shivchak, P.O. and P.S. Gaurichak, District Patna. 1.5. Pushpa Devi, Daughter of Late Sheo Kumari Devi, resident of village Pandeychak, P.O. Lai, P.S. Bihta, District Patna. 2.
Smt Lalti Devi, W/o Baleshwar Prasad resident of village Sarari, Khagaul, P.O. Shahpur, P.S. Shahpur, District Patna.
3.
Anita Devi, W/o Sahdeo Rai, resident of Dujra P.O. G.P.O., P.S. Budha Colony, District Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State Of Bihar.
2.
The District Magistrate Cum Collector, Patna. 3.
The Dy. Collector,Land Reforms, Danapur, Patna. 4.
The Circle Officer, Circle Office, Danapur, Patna. 5.
Awadhesh Kumar, S/o Late Sitaram Rai, resident of village Usari Khurd, P.O. and P.S. Shahpur, District Patna.
6.
Ram Krishna, S/o Late Radha Krishna Prasad, resident of village Usari Khurd, P.O. and P.S. Shahpur, District Patna. 7.
Krishna Prasad, S/o Late Radha Krishna Prasad, resident of village Usari Khurd, P.O. and P.S. Shahpur, District Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
None For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Anjani Kumar, Sr. Adv.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 20-07-2023 Despite repeated call, no one appears on behalf of the petitioners.
2. Counsel for the State appeared.
Patna High Court CWJC No.10710 of 2014(4) dt.20-07-2023 2/2
3. From the order dated 06.07.2023 also, it transpires that upon repeated call, no one appeared on behalf of the petitioners and as a matter of last indulgence, this case was adjourned.
4. Today also, no one appeared on behalf of the petitioners.
5. It transpires to this Court that counsel for the petitioners has no interest to pursue this case.
6. In this view of the matter, the present writ application is dismissed due to non-prosecution. (Dr. Anshuman, J.) sadique/- U