Qamrunnisa Khanam And ANR v. Ekbal Khan And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.1387 of 2018 ====================================================== 1.
Qamrunnisa Khanam and Anr 2.
Md. Umar Saifullah Khan @ Barkataullah Khan Son of Late Hidayatullah Khan Both resident of Pathanpatti, P.O. Daryapur, Police Station-Harsiddihi, District-East Champaran.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
Ekbal Khan and Ors Son of Muzaffar Khan @ Lal Babu, Resident of Mohalla Chikapatti, P.O. Kotihari, P.S. Motihari Town, District-East Champaran.
2.
Asadullah Khan @ Abdullah Khan Son of Late Hidaytullah Khan 3.
Sheema Afzal Khanam Wife of Nazmul Hoda Khan, Daughter of Late Hidayatullah Khan, Resident of Dariyapur, Police Station-Sangrampur, District-East Champaran.
4.
Noor Afzal Khanam Wife of Motim Hoda, D/o Late Hidayatullah Khan, Resident of Mohalla-Samanpura, Police Station Shastri Nagar, DistrictPatna. 5.
Isra Rahim Khanam Wife of Late Shahid Ali Khan, Daughter of Late Hidayatullah Khan, Resident of Imarat Manzil, Police Station-Gandhi Maidan, District-Patna.
6.
Gushara Khatoon Wife of Dr. Imran Khan Daughter of Late Hidayatullah Khan, Resident of Khajanchi Hat, Police Station-Khajanchi Hat, P.O. Khajanchi Hat, District-Purnea.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Raghib Ahsan, Sr. Adv.
Mr.Md. Shahab Khalil For the Respondent/s :
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 26-09-2022 Mr. Raghib Ahsan, learned senior counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners want to file additional written statement pursuant to the amendment allowed in the plaint by the impugned order dated 25-07-2018 passed in T.S. No. 524 of 2008 by learned Sub Judge-XIII, East Champaran at
Patna High Court C.Misc. No.1387 of 2018(3) dt.26-09-2022 2/2 Motihari.
It goes without saying that if the amendment has been allowed in the plaint, the defendant- petitioners have the right to file their additional written statement.
Let the petitioners, if so advised, file their additional written statement in the title suit.
With these observations, this civil miscellaneous application is dismissed.
(Anil Kumar Sinha, J) praful/- U