← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/16828/2015dismissed

Rambali Yadav v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-07-24Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

Patna High Court CWJC No.16828 of 2015 dt.24-07-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16828 of 2015 =========================================================== Rambali Yadav son of Late Bishram Yadav, Resident of village- Bhaluhar, Gram Panchayat- Chilor, P.O.- Chilor, P.S. & Prakhand & Anchal- Gurua, District Gaya .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through the Principal Secretary, Food Supply and Commerce Department, Patna

2. The District Magistrate, Gaya

3. The District Supply officer, Gaya

4. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Gaya

5. Block Development Officer, Gurua, Sherghati, Gaya

6. The Block Supply Officer, Gurua, Gaya .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Satish Kumar Sinha For the Respondents : Mr. Saurabh Kumar, AC to SC-19 Mr. Rishi Raj Sinha Mr. P.K. Singh, Advocate.

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 24-07-2018 The present writ petition has been filed for the following reliefs - "(A) A writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ/s, order/s, direction, quashing the following - I. To dispose of the Supply Appeal No. 40 pending before District magistrate cum Collector, Gaya against order passed by Sub-Divisional Officer, Sherghati in Supply Case No. 14/2014 on 27.11.2014 cancelling the license Public Distribution System Licence bearing no. 1 of 2007 of the petitioner.

Patna High Court CWJC No.16828 of 2015 dt.24-07-2018 II. To restrain the respondent to issue licence any other person with respect to the P.D.S. Shop of the petitioner till the pendency of the appeal before District Magistrate, Gaya. (B). To any relief/s for which the petitioner is found entitled to."

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states on instruction that the writ petition need no longer be pressed.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents appears and he has no objection in this regard.

4. The writ petition accordingly stands dismissed. (Vikash Jain, J) Md. Ibrarul/BT AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N.A.

Uploading Date 26.07.2018 Transmission Date N.A.