← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/3270/2024disposed

Ibtesham Shaheen v. The State Of Bihar

2024-04-01Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3270 of 2024 ====================================================== Ibtesham Shaheen Daughter of Mustafa Ali, resident of Village- Mahewa Kalan, P.O. - Nahwai, P.S. Manda, District - Prayagraj, State - Uttar Pradesh. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Education Department Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

Bihar Public Service Commission through its Chairman, Bailey Road, Patna. 3.

The Director Secondary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4.

The District Education Officer, Arwal.

5.

The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Arwal. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Suryakant Kumar, Adv.

For the State Mr. Kamlesh Kishore, AC to SC-12 For the BPSC Mr. Sanjay Pandey, Adv.

Mr. Nishant Kumar Jha, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 01-04-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2. At the very outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to approach before the respondent no. 3, the Director Secondary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna for redressal of her grievances. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

3. It is needless to state that in case appropriate representation is filed, within a period of two weeks from today, the respondent no. 3 shall dispose of the same after affording opportunity of personal hearing or through her counsel by

Patna High Court CWJC No.3270 of 2024(2) dt.01-04-2024 2/2 passing a reasoned and a speaking order, in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks, thereafter.

4. Respondent no. 3 shall be solely liable for noncompliance of this order within the stipulated period.

5. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion with regard to the merits of the claim of the petitioner.

6. The writ petition stands disposed of on the aforesaid terms.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U