Urmila Devi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 5996 of 2014 =========================================================== Urmila Devi W/O - Late Birendra Kumar Resident Of Village - Pasurai, P.S. - Islampur, District - Nalanda, At Present At Mohalla - Kusumpuri, Adarsh Colony, Road No. 1, Khemni Chak, P.S. - Ram Krishna Nagar, District - Patna - 27 .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Human Resources Development, Government Of Bihar, Patna

2. The Principal Secretary, Department Of Human Resource Development, Government Of Bihar, Patna

3. The Principal Secretary, Department Of Health, Government Of Bihar, Patna

4. The Director, Secondary Education, Department Of Human Resource Development, Government Of Bihar, Budh Marg, Patna

5. The District Education Officer, Nalanda At Biharsharif .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. SANJAY KUMAR For the Respondent/s : Mr. AAG3- ROY SHIVJI NATH =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 02-05-2016 In absence of any supporting material with regard to the bills, expenses and vouchers, that too with regard to the so called treatment, taken in the year 1989, there cannot be any decisive mandamus, issued upon the respondents to settle the claim of the petitioner on the head of the reimbursement of medical claim at this belated hour as is being done now by the petitioner.

Patna High Court CWJC No.5996 of 2014 dt.02-05-2016 2/2 The explanation that the necessary evidence was submitted but is lost cannot form the basis for a mandamus in vacuum.

Writ application is, therefore, dismissed.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) SKM/- AFR/NAFR N.A.F.R.

CAV DATE Uploading Date 03.05.2016 Transmission Date