Nawal Kishore Mandal v. The Life Insurance Corporation Of India And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6504 of 2013 ====================================================== Nawal Kishore Mandal Son Of Late Bengali Mandal Resident Of 404, Kanti Palace (Near Shastrinagar Post Office), Off Bailey Road, P.O. - L.B.S. Nagar, P.S. - Shastrinagar, District - Patna .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The Life Insurance Corporation Of India , Central Office, ;Yogakshenma', Jeevan Bima Marg, Mumbai - 400021 Through Its Chairman
2. The Chairman, Life Insurance Corporation Of India, Central Office. ' Yogakshenma', Jeevan Bima Marg, Mumbai - 400021
3. The Zonal Manager, Life Insurance Corporation Of India, East Central Zonal Office, Jeevan Deep, Exhibition Road, Patna - 800001
4. The Senior Divisional Manager, Life Insurance Corporation Of India, Patna Divisional Office No. 1, Jeevan Prakash, Frazer Road, Patna - 800001
5. The Divisional Manager, Life Insurance Corporation Of India, Patna Divisional Office No. 2, 4th Floor, Jeevan Ganga, Frazer Road, Patna - 800001
6. The Senior Branch Manager, Life Insurance Corporation Of India, Danapur Branch Office, Rajpati Palace, Takiyapar, P.O. - Digha, P.S - Danapur, District - Patna .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shanti Pratap, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Rajiv Ranjan Prasad, Adv. Mr. Akash Chaturvedi, Adv.
Mr. Sudhanshu Trivedi, Adv.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 29-02-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the State.
In this case, the petitioner is claiming that he is entitled to Transfer Grant amount of Rs. 37,120/-. The petitioner was posted at Patna and has been transferred to Danapur claiming that he is entitled to the aforesaid
Patna High Court CWJC No.6504 of 2013 (3) dt.29-02-2016 amount in terms of the section and policy decision of the L.I.C. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a representation of the petitioner is pending as is apparent from the counter affidavit.
In that view of the matt, the authority of the L.I.C. is directed to decide the claim of the petitioner within a period of six months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. With the aforementioned observation and direction, this application is disposed of.
(Shivaji Pandey, J) Rishi/- U