Md. Sahid @ Saeed @ Bablu @ Babuwa v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.9893 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -429 Year- 2016 Thana -KHAZANIHAT District- PURNIA ====================================================== Md. Sahid @ Saeed @ Bablu @ Babuwa, son of Faijuddin, resident of village - Singhalpur, Manihari Tola, P.S. Kadwa, District - Katihar .... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bijendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Jha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 03-03-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
This is an application for bail in connection with K. Hat (Maranga) P.S.Case No. 429 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that except confessional statement of co-accused there is nothing against the petitioner and no doubt petitioner has been made accused in four other cases but only on suspicion all those cases were instituted.
Heard learned APP also.
Having heard both sides and considering the fact that name of the petitioner has transpired only on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused and there is nothing against
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9893 of 2017 (2) dt.03-03-2017 2/2 the petitioner and other cases have been lodged only on suspicion against the petitioner, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea, in connection with K. Hat (Maranga) P.S.Case No. 429 of 2016, subject to the conditions that :- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, the prosecution is free to move the cancellation of his bail.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U