Mukesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16814 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-681 Year-2022 Thana- GANDHIMAIDAN District- Patna ====================================================== Mukesh Kumar S/o Ajab Lal Yadav R/o vill - Paharpur, Takiya Dih, P.S. - Khargpur, Distt. - Munger ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Raj Kishor Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Ram Priya Sharan Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 24-06-2024
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 419, 465, 466, 471 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and is a student and has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant based on confessional statement of Anand Kumar, who alleged that he had gone to center for appearing in an examination on behalf of the petitioner. The learned counsel next submits that the entire career of the petitioner would be jeopardized if he is sent to judicial custody and chances are bright that he may come in contact with hardened criminals. It is further submitted that it
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16814 of 2024(3) dt.24-06-2024 2/2 is not the case of the prosecution that it was petitioner who had asked Anand Kumar to appear on his behalf.
4. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the fact that petitioner is a student, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Gandhi Maidan P.S. Case No.681/2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) amit/- U T