Rubi Devi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2425 of 2016 ====================================================== Rubi Devi D/o Rais Singh Resident of village - Baigwan, P.S. Bikram, District - Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

The Additional Collector, Patna 3.

The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Patna Sadar, Patna 4.

The Circle Officer, Sampatchak, District Patna 5.

Mahendra Singh 6.

Ramesh Singh @ Ramesh Prasad Singh Both sons of Late Jagnarayan Sinha 7.

Pintu Kumar Son of Late Surendra Singh All are resident of village - Saidanichak, P.S. Pulwarisharif, District - Patna 8.

Ramjee Singh 9.

Mithilesh Singh @ Mittal Singh Both sons of Ram Das Singh and both are Resident of Mohalla - Purenderpur, Deo Kunwar Bhawan, Near Golcha Factory, P.O. G.P.O. P.S. Jakkanpur, District - Patna ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Satya Ranjan Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.R.R.K. Pandey- Sc29 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 01-08-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2. Following relief(s) have been prayed for in paragraph No. 1 of the present writ application:

"I.

To direct the concerned Respondents to disposed of earliest in Mutation Revision Case no. 46/2014-15 pending in the court of Additional Collector, Patna (Respondent no. 2)

Patna High Court CWJC No.2425 of 2016 dt.01-08-2024 2/2 forthwith in accordance with law.

II. To direct the concerned Respondents to pass necessary order on the petition filed by the petitioner on 8.10.2014 it is pending in the court of Additional Collector, Patna.

III To grant any other relief/reliefs which the petitioner may found entitled in the facts and circumstances of the case"

3. Learned counsel for the State referring to paragraph No. 7 of the counter affidavit, submits that the Mutation Revision Case No. 46/2014-15, has already been disposed of, and, as such, the writ application has become infructuous.

4. In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this application with liberty to move before appropriate forum by filing appropriate application along with application for condonation of delay, as the petitioner was pursuing his remedy before this Court.

5. The writ application is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Pankaj/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 06.08.2024 Transmission Date