Roushan Kumar @ Roushan Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11375 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-305 Year-2022 Thana- PARBATTA District- Khagaria ====================================================== 1.

ROUSHAN KUMAR @ ROUSHAN SINGH Son of Indradev Singh Resident of Village - Karna, P.S.- Parbatta, District - Khagaria. 2.

Indradev Singh Son of Late Shyamlal Singh Resident of Village - Karna, P.S.- Parbatta, District - Khagaria.

3.

Geeta Devi Wife of Indradev Singh Resident of Village - Karna, P.S.- Parbatta, District - Khagaria.

4.

Anjali Devi Wife of Roushan Kumar @ Roushan Singh Resident of Village - Karna, P.S.- Parbatta, District - Khagaria.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Indradeo Prasad, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Nityanand, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 11-05-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 304B, 201 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegedly, petitioners are said to have murdered the informant's daughter due to non-fulfillment of the dowry demand. They also concealed the dead body of her daughter. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. Petitioners are in-laws of the informant's daughter. No such occurrence as alleged ever took place. Petitioners have been

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11375 of 2023(2) dt.11-05-2023 2/2 falsely implicated in this case due to previous enmity. The allegation levelled against the petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. The daughter of the informant has been suffering from mental problem. The husband of the deceased is in judicial custody. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, as there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.

25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned lower Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Parbatta P.S. Case No. 305 of 2022, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) divyanshi/- U T