Rajiv Kumar Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.495 of 2020 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17754 of 2019 ====================================================== 1.

Rajiv Kumar Sah Son of Shobha Chand Sah Resident of Village- Belaganj, Ward No. 13, P.S.-Bhimpur, District- Supaul.

2.

Jai Prakash Sah Son of Shobha Chand Sah Resident of Village- Belaganj, Ward No. 13, P.S.-Bhimpur, District- Supaul.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna namely Shri Deepak Kumar.

2.

The Principal Secretary Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Government of Bihar, Patna, namely Sri Vivek Kumar Singh. 3.

The Divisional Commissioner Koshi Division, Saharsa namely Sri Santhil K. Kumar.

4.

The District Collector-cum-District Officer Supaul, namely Shri Mahendra Kumar.

5.

The Deputy Collector Land Reform, Triveniganj, District-Supaul, namely Shri Vinay Kumar Singh.

6.

The Clerk Officer Block and P.S.-Chhatapur, District-Supaul, namely Shri Sumit Kumar Singh.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Amrit Abhijat For the State :

None ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 27-09-2024 Heard Mrs. Patla Kumari, learned counsel for the petitioner and no one appears on behalf of the State.

2. The present petition has been filed to initiate contempt proceeding against the contemnor against the order 30.08.2019 passed in CWJC No. 17754 of 2019.

3. A show cause has come on behalf of the opposite party nos. 4 to 6 annexing Annexure-A which is the order passed

Patna High Court MJC No.495 of 2020(3) dt.27-09-2024 2/2 by the Circle Officer, Chhatapur, Supaul in Miscellaneous Case No. 09 of 2017-18 according to which, the claim of the petitioner stands rejected for vide an order dated 24.02.2020.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a copy was served only yesterday and then they came to know about the rejection. Further submission is that she may granted permission to challenge the order.

5. In view of the fact that the petitioner was not having any knowledge and it has come to the knowledge after filing of show cause, liberty is granted to challenge the order by way of writ petition.

6. MJC No. 495 of 2020 is disposed of.

(Rajiv Roy, J) vinayak/- U