← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./12613/2023bail rejected

Pappu Rajbanshi v. The State Of Bihar

2023-05-15Mr. Justice Nawneet Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12613 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-433 Year-2021 Thana- AKBARPUR District- Nawada ====================================================== PAPPU RAJBANSHI Son of Mathura Rajbanshi Resident of Village- Sirpat, P.S.- Akbarpur, District- Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Birendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 15-05-2023 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

This is an application for regular bail on behalf of the petitioner for the offences alleged under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, registered in connection with Akbarpur P.S.Case No. 433 of 2021.

The informant, the deceased and the petitioner are own brothers. As per allegation, the petitioner Pappu Rajbanshi, his wife Sunita Devi entered into the house of the informant and they assaulted Pradeep Rajbanshi on his head with iron rod. They also assaulted Santosh Rajbanshi. Pradeep Rajbanshi died in the PMCH in course of treatment.

The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12613 of 2023(2) dt.15-05-2023 2/2 that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case.

There is specific allegation against the petitioner that he and his wife Sunita Devi committed murder of Pradeep Rajbanshi in sleeping state by assaulting with iron rod. It appears that the bail application of Sunita Devi has been rejected by a coordinate Bench of this Court in Cr.Misc. No.29969 of 2022.

In my view, it is not a fit case to grant the privilege of bail to the petitioner. It is accordingly rejected. (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) HR/- U T