Pradip Kumar Jha v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.544 of 2019 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6842 of 2017 ====================================================== Pradip Kumar Jha, S/o Surendra Kishore Jha, resident of Village- Laxmipur, P.S.- Bhargama, District- Araria, the Headmaster of Shri Shila Nath Sanskrit Prathmik Sah Madhya Vidyalaya, Bhatgama Laxmipur, Block- Bhargama, District- Araria.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Chief-Secretary, Namely- Deepak Kumar, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 2.
The Principal- Secretary, Namely- Sri R.K. Mahajan, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 3.
The Special Director, Namely Giribar Dayal Singh, Secondary Education, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
4.
The Chairman, Namely- Bharti Mehta, Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha board, Patna 5.
The Secretary, Namely- Bharti Mehta Bihar Shanskrit Shiksha Board, Patna 6.
The District Magistrate, Namerly-Sri Himanshu Sharma, Araria 7.
The District Education Officer, Namely-Sri Ashok Kumar Mishra, Araria 8.
The Circle Officer, Bhargama, Namely-Mahendra Singh, Araria ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Mukesh Kumar No.1, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Smt. Shilp Singh (GA-12) For the BSS Board : Mr. S. S. Sundram, Advocate Mr. Shashank Shekhar Jha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 01-12-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the opposite parties.
By order dated 18.06.2018 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 6842 of 2017, violation of which has been complained in the present contempt application, the Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board was directed to take final decision for grant of recognition to the
Patna High Court MJC No.544 of 2019(3) dt.01-12-2021 2/2 petitioner's school/institution.
It is stated at the Bar that the said order of this Court has since been complied with and a final decision has been taken refusing recognition to the petitioner's school. In such view of the matter, I am not inclined to proceed with the present contempt application any further. The petitioner shall be at liberty to question the correctness of the decision of the Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board in appropriate proceeding in accordance with law.
This application stands disposed of.
(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) uday/- U