Fulmati Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13325 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-126 Year-2025 Thana- Haraiya District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.

Fulmati Devi W/o- Avadhesh Kushwaha @ Avdhesh Kushwaha Resident of Village - Tumariya Tola Ward No. 03, P.S. - Haraiya, District - East Champaran 2.

Reena Devi @ Rina Devi W/o- Mukesh Sah Resident of Village - Tumariya Tola Ward No. 03, P.S. - Haraiya, District - East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Adarsh Ranjan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Uday Pratap Singh Mr.Dhurendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 09-04-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned APP for the State and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant.

2. The petitioners seek bail in anticipation of their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 318(4),308(4),351(2),3(5) of the B.N.S.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and are women and the informant alleges that in 2024, Fulmati, Nitu and Reena had cheated the informant of Rs.1,30,000/-, 70,000/- and 50,000/- respectively and threatened not to

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13325 of 2026(3) dt.09-04-2026 2/3 take any legal action or else her husband would be implicated in a false case.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is also submitted that allegations are vague and cryptic. It i s next submitted that no doubt, the beneficiaries had deposited money but the amount which is being claimed is exaggerated.

5. Learned A.P.P. as well as the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant opposes the anticipatory bail application, but then, are not in a position to rebut the submissions of the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that allegations as alleged in the FIR is vague and cryptic.

6. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, the petitioners, above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, are directed to be released on anticipatory bail on their furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13325 of 2026(3) dt.09-04-2026 3/3 where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Haraiya P. S. Case No.126 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T