← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/19161/2018disposed

Jangbahadur Sah v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2025-11-11Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19161 of 2018 ====================================================== Jangbahadur Sah S/o Late Shankar Sah, R/o Mauza- Chikni, Jakiyari, P.O. P.S.- Raxaul, District- E. Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

The Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Bihar, Patna. 4.

The Director, Land Acquisition, Bihar, Patna. 5.

The Joint Secretary, Department of Home, Bihar, Patna. 6.

The Collector, Motihari.

7.

The Land Acquisition Officer, Motihari.

8.

The Union of India, through the Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, through its Secretary 9.

The Secretary, Border Management Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, North Block, New Delhi ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Mallika Mazumdar, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Raj Kishore Roy, GP-18 For the UOI :

Mr. Anshay Bahadur Mathur, CGC ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 11-11-2025 Heard Ms. Mallika Mazumdar, learned counsel for the petitioner, the State and the learned counsel representing the Union of India.

2. The present petition has been preferred for the grant of following relief(s):

"for a direction for payment of the money to the farmers whose land have been acquired in 2011 by S.S.B. (Seema Surkhsa Bal)

Patna High Court CWJC No.19161 of 2018(5) dt.11-11-2025 2/2 for Construction of its Head Quarters in Mauza Chikni, District East Champaran. And the entire compensation money has not been paid to farmers. The rest money should be paid with interest amount. That the remaining amount should be paid as per new Act."

3. It has been informed by Ms. Mazumdar, that the rest 20% amount has been paid. As such, the matter has become infructuous.

4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of as become infructuous.

(Rajiv Roy, J) vinayak/- U