Patna High CourtMJC/1406/2014disposed

Bharat Prasad v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-08-19Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1406 of 2014 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 5209 of 2011 ===========================================================

1. Bharat Prasad, Son Of Jivlal Mehta, Resident Of Village- Ambari, P.O. Ambari, P.S. Shekhapur Sarai, Sheikhpura (Old Munger) At Present Resident Of Ramkrishna Nagar, P.S. Ram Krishna Nagar, Diwa Colony, (Behind Devnarayan Market), Patna800 027. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Gramin Karya Bibhag, Patna Sri B. Rajendra

2. The Engineer-In-Chief, Gramin Karya Bibhag, Patna Namely

3. The Chief Engineer, Gramin Karya Bibhag, Patna Namely Akshya Lal Ram

4. The Superintending Engineer, Gramin Karya Bibhag, Patna Circle, Patna Namely Sri Nirmal Kumar

5. The Executive Engineer, Rural Development Special Division, Arwal (Now Known As 'Gramin Karya Bibhag'), Karya Pramandal, Arwal, Namely Bed Prakash Law.

6. The Accountant General, Birchand Patel Path, Patna- 800 001. Sri Sanjay Kumar

7. The District Development Commissiioner, Arwal, Namely Sri Ranjan Kumar Sinha

8. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Arwal, Namely Sri Ranjan Kumar Sinha

9. The Chief Secretary, Rural Works Department, Namely Sri B. Rajendra Vishashriay Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna, Bihar

10. The Joint Secretary, Rural Works Department, Vishweshariya Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna, Bihar, Namely Sri Surendra Kumar Verma

11. The Collector-Cum-District Magistrate, Arwal Namely Kuar Jang Bhadur

12. The Treasury Officer, Sheikhpura, Namely S.N. Arya .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ghanshyam Sharma For the Respondent/s : Mr. Madhukar Krishna Sinha, SC 1 Mr Mani Kant Mishra =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 19-08-2015 In view of Annexure- E, the contempt application is disposed of. Let the petitioner assail Annexure- E, if he wants. (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) sk U