Munendra Prasad Yadav @ Munendra Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9009 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-202 Year-2019 Thana- AMDABAD District- Katihar ====================================================== Munendra Prasad Yadav @ Munendra Kumar Yadav Son of Shivbuchan Yadav, Resident of Village-Kishanpur Hemkunj, P.S.-Amdabad, DistrictKatihar. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sushmita Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anand Mohan Prasad Mehta ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 03-03-2020 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Amdabad P.S. Case No. 202 of 2019 for the offence punishable under Sections 406, 409 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The allegation is regarding the accused persons, primarily the co-accused person namely Pranav Das, to have taken a sum of Rs. 1000/- each from the beneficiaries for making payment of incentive amount for the purposes of construction of toilets. Subsequently, the enquiry is stated to have been conducted wherein the name of the petitioner had also transpired as the person who had also taken some money from the beneficiaries.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9009 of 2020(2) dt.03-03-2020 2/2 The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the allegation is against the co-accused person, namely, Pranav Das and the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case, inasmuch as he has got no role to play in the alleged incident. Lastly, it is submitted that the petitioner is having a clean antecedent and undertakes to join the ensuing investigation.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, coupled with the fact that the petitioner is having a clean antecedent, I deem it fit and proper to direct for release of the petitioner on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, in the event of arrest or surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today, the petitioner, above named, id directed to be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail- bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Katihar in connection with Amdabad P.S. Case No. 202 of 2019, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Tiwary/- U T